Controllable laning phase for oppositely driven disk systems
Liu Lin1, Li Ke1, Zhou Xiao-Lin1, He Lin-Li2, †, Zhang Lin-Xi1, ‡
Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Department of Physics, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: linlihe@wzu.edu.cn lxzhang@zju.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21873082, 21674082, and 21674096) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (Grant No. LY19B040006).

Abstract

A two-dimensional binary driven disk system embedded by impermeable tilted plates is investigated through nonequilibrium computer simulations. It is well known that a binary disk system in which two particle species are driven in opposite directions exhibits jammed, phase separated, disordered, and laning states. The presence of tilted plates can not only advance the formation of laning phase, but also effectively stabilize laning phase by suppressing massively drifting behavior perpendicular to the driving force. The lane width distribution can be controlled easily by the interplate distance. The collective behavior of driven particles in laning phase is guided by the funnel-shaped confinements constituted by the neighboring tilted plates. Our results provide the important clues for investigating the mechanism of laning formation in driven system.

1. Introduction

Far from thermodynamic equilibrium, nonequilibrium system often exhibits a series of fascinating phase transitions along with unusual pattern formation and novel transport properties,[1,2] especially in driven diffusive systems.[3,4] For example, the oppositely charged colloidal mixtures driven by an electric field will undergo a nonequilibrium phase transition from a disordered state into a dynamically ordered state, such as sliding crystal or sliding smectic.[5,6] One of the most striking dynamical behaviors is a transition to lane formation, where particles of the same kind move collectively in the direction parallel to the field direction, and high mobility is achieved through organization of the particles into noncolliding chains.[710] Such a nonequilibrium transition towards lane formation is a general phenomenon occurring in dusty plasmas,[11,12] granular matter,[13] as well as in active matter composed of autonomously moving agents such as pedestrians,[14,15] social insects,[16] bacteria and cells,[17,18] and artificial colloidal microswimmers.[19]

Recently, a lot of experimental,[6] theoretical,[20,21] and simulation[7,2224] studies have been devoted to investigating the lane formation in mixtures of oppositely driven particles. Dzubiella et al. investigated this issue by experimental means and Brownian dynamics simulations. They put forward a dynamical criterion for judging the lane formation: there is an enhanced lateral mobility of particles induced by collisions with particles driven in the opposite direction, which sharply decreases once lanes are formed. Therefore, particles in a lane can be regarded as being in a dynamically ‘locked-in’ state.[7,8,23] Chakrabarti et al. used the dynamic density-functional theory to argue that the Langevin dynamics of oppositely driven particles implies laning via a dynamic instability of the homogenous phase.[20,21] Samuel et al. studied the mixtures of self-propelled particles in a two-dimensional (2D) particle system by using Brownian dynamics simulations. The simulations demonstrated that the two species spontaneously segregate to generate a rich array of dynamical domain structures whose properties depend on the propulsion velocity, density, and composition.[22] Reichhardt et al. numerically examined a 2D particle system in which two particle species are driven in opposite directions. For particle density Φ < 0.55 and increasing the drive force, they identified four dynamical phases, i.e., a crystalline jammed phase, a fully phase separated state, a strongly fluctuating liquid phase, and a laning phase or smectic state. The transitions between these different phases are associated with jumps or dips in the velocity–force curves and the differential mobility along with global changes in the structural order of the system.[2325] In their other work, they simulated a laning system containing active disks that obey run-and-tumble dynamics, and identified a novel drive-induced clustered laning state that remains stable even at density below the activity-induced clustering transition of the undriven system.[26]

The formation of lanes with high moving velocity can accelerate particle transport along the field direction but suppress massively transport perpendicular to the field. Therefore, laning transition is expected to be widely used in type-II superconductors,[27,28] electron crystals, such as electronic ink and electrophoresis in microfluidics, and even as a concept of panic theory applied to pedestrian zones.[29] Nevertheless, the nature of laning transition is still being debated and key variables have not been characterized yet. Meanwhile, in most cases, the dynamical lane is unstable and non-uniform with drifting defects. In order to obtain the stable laning phase, where the lane width can be controlled and tailored freely, in this paper, we focus on a 2D particle system in which two particle species are driven in opposite directions. In the absence of confinement or obstacle, such a system is known to exhibit four dynamical phases, i.e., a jammed phase with no motion, a fully phase-separated state with high-mobility, a disordered fluctuating state with lower mobility, and a laning phase in a free flow.[8,30] Then embedding tilted plates into the 2D driven particle system can effectively stabilize laning phase by suppressing massively drifting behavior perpendicular to the driving force.[31] Finally, lane width and distribution can be controlled freely by the interplate distance and the orientation of the tilted plates, respectively. These results can provide important clues for investigating the mechanism and application of laning formation in driven systems.

2. Model and method

We numerically simulate a 2D disk system of size L × L with periodic boundary conditions in the x and y directions, containing Nd disks of radius Rd. Here L = 30 and Rd = 0.5. The particle density Φ is defined as the number of particles divided by the area coverage of the disks, i.e., . Reichhardt et al. studied a binary system of two disks driven in opposite directions, and revealed four dynamic phases, i.e., a jammed state (phase I), a fully phase separated state (phase II), a mixed or disordered state (phase III), and a laning state (phase IV). Their results showed that the system is always in a laning state for particle density Φ < 0.55, while the disks can organize into more than four dynamic phases for Φ ≥ 0.55.[23] In our study, Φ = 0.82. In addition, N immobile plates with a certain tilt angle θ are embedded into a 2D driven disk system with θ = 10°. The simple model is shown in Fig. 1. In the uniform case, the interplate distance di is defined by L/N, where N varies from N = 0 to N = 6 in our work. Of course, the interplate distance di can also be freely set to be a certain value. The embedded plate is composed of mp particles (here mp = 13) with a fixed distance Rp between consecutive particles. Here Rp = 0.5, which is equal to the disk radius Rd.

Fig. 1. Simple model of tilted plates with angle θ embedded in a 2D disk system, with di (i = 1, 2, …, n) denoting interplate distance between two adjacent tilted plates. Here θ = 10°, red disks (specie A) are driven in +x direction, and blue disks (specie B) are driven in −x direction.

The dynamics of disk i obeys the overdamped equation of motion as follows: Here, η is the damping constant and Ri is the location of disk i. The disk–disk and disk–plate interactions are modeled as a finite range repulsive harmonic spring. The disk–disk interaction force is where rij = RiRj, , and Θ is the Heaviside step function. Here the spring constant k1 = 60. The disk–plate interaction is where Np = N × mp, rip = RiRp, , and k2 = 800. Each disk is subjected to an applied driving force, , where N1 disks are driven in the positive x direction with Ai = 1.0, and the remaining N2 = NdN1 disks are driven in the negative x direction with Ai = −1.0. Here, N2 = N1. After applying the drive force, the systems are run at least 1 × 107 simulation time steps to ensure it can reach a steady state. Then we measure the average disk velocity for each species and normalize it by N1(2) to obtain the average velocity per disk , where Vi is the instantaneous velocity of disk i. In our study, with damping constant of η = 1.0, the overdamped dynamics of system is in the free flow limit and then the disks move at a velocity of 〈V1〉 = FD and 〈V2〉 = −FD.

3. Result and discussion

Firstly, we compare the binary driven disk systems without (N = 0) and with (N = 2 and 4) tilted plates. Figures 2(a)2(c) display the specie A average velocity 〈VA〉, d〈VA〉/dFD, and the fraction of sixfold coordinated particles P6, as a function of FD, respectively. Here , where zi is the coordination number of particle i obtained from a Voronoi construction.[24] The above velocity–force curves indicate that they also have four distinct dynamical phases: a crystalline jammed phase I, a fully phase separated state II, a strongly fluctuating liquid phase III, and a laning phase IV. The curve of d〈VA〉/dFD further indicates the transition points between these dynamical phases, as well as P6 characterizes the disk ordering and the nature of the dynamic fluctuations.

Fig. 2. Plots of (a) 〈VA〉, (b) d〈VA〉/dFD, and (c) P6 versus FD for three different values of N.

In general, the potential energy initially increases and then decreases towards its steady-state limit. That means that starting from a mixed configuration at time t = 0, the opposite drive increases the separation between particles of different species, which increases the potential energy while subsequent laning causes these energetically consumed collisions to decrease.[8,32] Now taking N = 0 for example, the jammed state (phase I) is located in the range of 0 < FD < 0.3 with 〈VA〉 = 0, indicating that disks are stuck with no motion. Correspondingly, P6 ≈ 0.92, indicating that the system has a strong sixfold disk ordering. Within phase I, the disks form a dense cluster with triangular order as shown in the disk configuration by Fig. 3(a) for FD = 0.1. In our system, Φ = 0.82, which is below the jammed limit, therefore P6 < 1.0 due to the disks on the edge of the jammed cluster with no six neighbors. The first peak in d〈VA〉/dFD curve occurs at FD = 0.3, indicating the transition from phase I to phase II. The phase separated state (phase II) appears in the range of 0.3 < FD < 1.15 with 〈VA〉 increasing linearly with FD and d〈VA〉/dFD = 1.0, meaning that the particles are in a free flow regime. Meanwhile, both species are separated in phases and exhibit a triangular ordering with P6 ≈ 0.86 as shown in Fig. 3(a) at FD = 0.7. Surprisingly, a negative peak in d〈VA〉/dFD curve appears at FD = 1.15 coinciding with the transition from phase II to phase III. In phase III, particle collision frequency increases, causing a large amount of energy loss for the whole system and lowering the mobility.[26,33] This is a typical example of negative differential mobility where the particle average velocity decreases with driving force increasing. In the system with quenched disorder, the negative differential mobility has also been observed at transition from ordered to disordered or turbulent flow phase as a function of increasing drive.[32,33]

Fig. 3. Disk configurations for three cases with different values of FD for N = 0 (a), 2 (b), and 4 (c).

The strongly fluctuating liquid state (phase III) takes up the range of 1.15 < FD < 5.45, accompanied by a sharp drop in P6, illustrating that the system enters into the disordered flow phase. In phase III, two particle species continuously collide with each other, leading to a massive velocity loss in the y direction, transverse to the drive direction. Finally, two particle species are intensively mixed as shown in Fig. 3(a) for FD = 4.5. Another positive peak in d〈VA〉/dFD curve appears at FD = 5.45, corresponding to the transition from phase III to phase IV. The laning state (phase IV) is observed when FD > 5.45 with d 〈VA〉/dFD = 1.0, demonstrating that the particles are in a free flow regime. As shown in Fig. 3(a) at FD = 7.5, the disks form multiple oppositely moving lanes. Meanwhile, the system exhibits a triangular ordering again with P6 going back to P6 ≈ 0.82. These results of the binary driven disk system (N = 0), are completely consistent with the studies by Reichhardt et al.[22,23]

Then we turn to the binary driven disk systems embedded with tilted plates,[34,35] such as N = 2 and 4. There are also four typical dynamical phases mentioned above, especially in the case of N = 4 shown in Fig. 3(c). From Figs. 2 and 3, we can see that the III–IV transitions occur at FD = 4.5 for N = 2 and FD = 5.0 for N = 4, both are lower than FD = 5.45 for N = 0. This result indicates that the presence of tilted plates does not change the dynamical phase transition but can lower the critical driving force at which the dynamical III–IV transition occurs, and advance the formation of laning phase. A closer look at Fig. 3(b) shows the jammed and phase separated states (phases I and II) depend on a competition between two effects: the internal interaction force between the particles, and the external driving force, irrelevant to the tilted plates. In laning formation (phase IV), there appear two different configurations with driving force increasing, named laning-A and laning-B phases, respectively. At FD = 4.5, the laning-A phase looks similar to phase II, but essentially is completely different from it, which is uniformly divided into two lanes induced by two plates. At FD = 7.5, the laning-B phase is formed as the high driving force, independent of the tilted plates, similar to the laning phase without plates as shown in Fig. 3(a). For N = 4 at FD = 7.5, laning-A phase is also uniformly divided into four lanes by four plates. Of course, as driving force reaches a certain value, the inducing effects of the tilted plates will fail, and system is finally settled into laning-B phase. As a result, a regular and uniform laning-A phase characterized lane width, which will be discussed below in detail, can be obtained by the tilted plates if the external driving force does not exceed a critical strength. As is well known, a static confinement or obstacle is shown to be able to accumulate and collect driven particles and trapping devices. This collective effect can be used to guide or rectify the motion of microbes and man-made microswimmers in a controlled way.[36,37] Here, neighboring tilted plates can be regarded as funnel-shaped confinements one by one. The funnels can first guide the collective behaviors of the same driven particles to the direction of the cusp of funnels. Once particles are in a lane, transverse diffusivity is further suppressed by two plates and ordered laning phase is formed.

Next, we focus on the laning phase with FD ≥ 7.5 for two cases without and with tilted plates. Here the species A average velocity in the y direction 〈VAy〉 as a function of FD is calculated. As shown in Fig. 4(a), without tilted plates (N = 0, black line), the magnitude of 〈VAy〉 is on the order of 10−3, extending over the range from 0.001 to 0.004. The value of 〈VAy〉 increases with the value of FD increasing, indicating the massive velocity loss in the y direction. After embedding the tilted plates (N = 2 and 4, red and blue lines, respectively), the value of 〈VAy〉 is reduced to a lower magnitude, 10−4, and the velocity fluctuations drop to zero as the drive force increases. Especially for FD = 7.5, we track the trajectory of particles with an initial y0 = 12.3 coordinate after the system has reached an equilibrium state through 1 × 107 time steps. The time-dependent y coordinate of the selected disks with an initial y coordinate is monitored as indicated in Fig. 4(b). The trajectory of y coordinate in the case without tilted plates (black line) presents an oscillating upstate, which implies that there is the drift behavior behind laning phase, while that in the case with tilted plates (red line) is almost a straight line, which indicates that tilted plates can stabilize laning phase by suppressing drifting behavior perpendicular to the driving force.

Fig. 4. (a) Plots of average velocity of species A disk in direction 〈VAyversus FD for three different values of N, and (b) time-dependent y coordinate of selected disk with initial y0 coordinate for FD = 7.5.

Figure 5(a) further displays the average lane width 〈d〉 as a function of FD for N = 0 and 4. For N = 4, as the drive force increases, 〈d〉 gradually declines from 〈d〉 ≈ 7.0 to a stable value 〈d〉 ≈ 2.2. The related dynamical phases can be simply understood by a competition between three effects: the internal interaction forces between the particles, the interaction between particles and titled plates, and the external driving force. When the driving force is very small, the interaction between particles plays a dominant role, and the system is in phase I. With the driving force increasing, these three effects reach a relatively balanced state,[37,38] where the particles of the same kind gather together and the particles of different kinds are significantly separated from each other, and then the system is in a phase-separated state. However, as the driving force is getting larger and larger, the interaction between particles is not enough to offset the external force, so that the particles tend to be discrete and disordered.[38] In the final stage, as the driving force is much larger than the internal interaction between particles, the external driving force and the guiding of tilted plates accelerate the formation of laining phases. As 5.5 < FD ≤ 7.5, a well laning-A phase is obtained, uniformly divided into four lanes with 〈d〉 ≈ 7.0 as shown in Fig. 3(c). As the value of FD increases, the influence of tilted plates will diminish and even disappear. For FD ≥ 17.5, the two curves for N = 0 and 4 basically overlap, illustrating that the system is settled into laning-B phase, irrelevant to the tilted plates. Additionally, even if the tilted plates have no impact on the lane width, it always can stabilize the laning phase as marked by the error bars in Fig. 5(a). Furthermore, the variance of lane width 〈d2〉-〈d2 as a function of N is shown in Fig. 5(b). In the case without tilted plates (N = 0), the variance 〈d2〉-〈d2 is in a range between 1.30 and 1.64, and decreases inversely as driving force increases. Once tilted plates are embedded, 〈d2〉-〈d2 drops sharply to 0.2, and even tends to zero for N = 4 and 6, independent of the driving force. Moreover, the reduced probability distribution function P of lane width for FD = 7.5 is shown in Fig. 6. Here, the probability distribution P(〈d/d〉) is normalized by ∫P(d/〈d〉)Δ(〈d〉/〈d〉) = 1/〈d〉. For the laning phase of N = 0, the value of P extends from 0.7 to 1.3, obeying the Gaussian distribution,[39] while for N = 4, the value of P is all concentrated at 1.0, following the δ function distribution.[40] These results shown in Figs. 5 and 6 also support the fact that the tilted plates make the laning phase more stable and uniform.

Fig. 5. (a) Average lane width 〈d〉 as a function of FD for N = 0 and 2, and (b) variance of lane width 〈d2〉-〈d2 as a function of N for FD = 6, 7.5, and 10.
Fig. 6. The reduced probability distribution P with respect to d/〈d〉 at FD = 7.5 for N = 0 and 4.

According to the results, we can conclude that the tilted plates can effectively govern the collective behaviors of driven particles and then stabilize the laning phase by suppressing drifting behavior perpendicular to the driving force. In this part, we hope to control the lane width distribution freely by varying the interplate distance di, not necessarily equal. Figures 7(a1)7(e1) display the disk configurations for N = 4 and FD = 7.5 with different values of di, which is characterized by the ratio of d1:d2:d3:d4 . The five sets of d1:d2:d3:d4 are selected, which cover the cases of uniform, non-uniform, large differences, and small differences, respectively. Form the configurations, we can make a preliminary judgment that the lane width completely depends on the pre-set interplate distance di. Correspondingly, the density profiles of the species A and B along the +y direction are also shown in Figs. 7(a2)7(e2). The lane width distributions induced by the tilted plates are marked at the top of the density profiles. Taking d1:d2:d3:d4 = 1:2:2:1 for example, the actually measured distance is 1:2.067:2.070:0.989, which is consistent with the pre-set value.

Fig. 7. (a1)–(e1) Disk configurations with different distance ratios of d1:d2:d3:d4 for FD = 7.5 and N = 4, and (a2)–(e2) density profiles of species A and B along +y direction.

For N = 4 and FD = 7.5, we further change the orientation of the tilted plates from θ = 10° to θ = −10°, the same uniform laning phases are obtained as shown in Figs. 8(a) and 8(b). The only difference is the order in which the A/B lanes are arranged. As discussed above, the funnel-shaped confinements can first govern the collective behaviors of driven particles from the entrance to the cusp of funnels. As shown in Fig. 8(a), the red disks (species A) driven in the +x direction gather in the third layer characterized by the yellow arrows, while the blue disks (species A) driven in the −x direction gather in the second layer characterized by the red arrows. The time-evolution processes of disk configurations are displayed in Fig. 9. We can see that initially the system is in a fluctuating transient state with disk–disk collisions. Then the funnel-shaped confinements constituted by the neighboring tilted plates govern the collective behaviors of driven particles to the direction of the cusp of funnels. Once driven disks are in a lane (about 1 × 106 time steps), transverse diffusivity is further suppressed and ordered laning phase is formed (after 6 × 106 time steps).

Fig. 8. Disk configuration with tilted angle of θ = 10° (a) and θ = −10° (b) for FD = 7.5 and N = 4.
Fig. 9. Time-evolution processes of disk configurations for FD = 7.5 and N = 4.
4. Conclusions

We have numerically examined a 2D binary system of particles driven in opposite directions. There are four typical dynamical phases: jammed, phase separated, disordered, and laning states. In general, the dynamical laning phase is unstable with drifting defects and non-uniform lane width distribution, which may impede its wide application in accelerating particle transport. To eliminate drifting defects and control the lane width within laning phase, impermeable tilted plates are introduced into the driven system. We map a rough phase diagram as a function of driving force and plate number. Embedded with tilted plates, the laning phase is stabilized as indicated by a drop both in particle velocity perpendicular to the driving force, and in the variance of lane width. Moreover, the lane width distribution can be controlled freely by the interplate distance. We further show that the collective behavior of the particles of the same species s in laning phase can be governed by the funnel-shaped confinements constituted by the neighboring tilted plates. Our results suggest that the embedded tilted plates can serve as an alternative method of stabilizing laning phase and controlling lane width distribution.

Reference
[1] Cross M C Hohenberg P C 1993 Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 851
[2] Mikhailov A S Showalter K 2006 Phys. Rep. 425 79
[3] Katz S Lebowitz J Spohn H 1983 Phys. Rev. 28 1655
[4] Marro J Dickman R 1999 Nonequilibrium phase transitions in lattice models Cambridge Cambridge University Press 50 127
[5] Leunissen M E Christova C G Hynninen A P Royall C P Campbell A I Imhof A Dijkstra M van Roij R van Blaaderen A 2005 Nature 437 235
[6] Vissers T Wysocki A Rex M Loewen H Royall C P Imhof A van Blaaderen A 2011 Soft Matter 7 2352
[7] Dzubiella J Hoffmann G P Löwen H 2009 Phys. Rev. 79 021402
[8] Glanz T Löwen H 2012 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24 464114
[9] Klymko K Geissler P L Whitelam S 2016 Phys. Rev. 94 022608
[10] Poncet A Bénichou O Démery V Oshanin G 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 118002
[11] Morfill G E Konopka U Kretschmer M Rubin-Zuzic M Thomas H M Zhdanov S K Tsytovich V 2006 New J. Phys. 8 7
[12] Sutterlin K R Wysocki A Ivlev A V Rath C Thomas H M Rubin-Zuzic M Goedheer W J Fortov V E Lipaev A M Molotkov V I 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 085003
[13] Ciamarra M P Coniglio A Nicodemi M 2005 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17 S2549
[14] Jiang R Helbing D Shukla P Wu Q 2006 Physica 368 567
[15] Kölbl R Helbing D 2003 New J. Phys. 5 48
[16] Chowdhury D Nishinari K Schadschneider A 2004 Phase Transit. 77 601
[17] Wensink H H Löwen H 2012 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 24 464130
[18] Yamao M Naoki H Ishii S 2011 PLoS One 6 e27950
[19] Delhommelle Jerome 2005 Phys. Rev. 71 016705
[20] Chakrabarti J Dzubiella J Löwen H 2003 Europhys. Lett. 61 415
[21] Chakrabarti J Dzubiella J Löwen H 2004 Phys. Rev. 70 012401
[22] McCandlish R Baskaran Aparna Michael F 2012 Soft Matter 8 2527
[23] Reichhardt C Reichhardt C J O 2018 Soft Matter 14 490
[24] Yang Y McDermott D Olson Reichhardt C J Reichhardt C 2017 Phys. Rev. 95 042902
[25] McDermott D Yang Y Olson Reichhardt C J Reichhardt C 2019 Phys. Rev. 99 042601
[26] Reichhardt C Thibault J Papanikolaou S Reichhardt C J O 2018 Phys. Rev. 98 022603
[27] Reichhardt C Reichhardt C J O 2017 Rep. Prog. Phys. 80 026501
[28] Bhattacharya S Higgins M J 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 2617
[29] Helbing D Farkas I J Vicsek T 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 1240
[30] Braun O M Dauxois T Paliy M V 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 1295
[31] Gutierrez J Silhanek A V Van de Vondel J Gillijns W Moshchalkov V 2009 Phys. Rev. 80 140514
[32] Solon A P Fily Y Baskaran A Cates M E Kafri Y Kardar M Tailleur J 2015 Nat. Phys. 11 673
[33] Mijalkov M Volpe G 2013 Soft Matter 9 6376
[34] Sipos O Nagy K Di Leonardo R Galajda P 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 258104
[35] Tsiok E N Dudalov D E Fomin Yu D Ryzhov V N 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 032110
[36] Qi W Dijkstra M 2015 Soft Matter 11 2852
[37] Redner G S Hagan M F Baskaran A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 055701
[38] Tung C Harder J Valeriani C Cacciuto A 2016 Soft Matter 12 555
[39] Chen J Hua Y Zhou X L Zhang L X 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 15006
[40] Kaiser A Sokolov A Aranson I S 2015 Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 224 1275